Knut,
On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:19:01 +0200, Knut Petersen <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi James!
> > Checking out the commit before any of those three that Malte checed in and
> > then I built LilyPond and simply ran
> >
> > lilypond -png $LILYPOND_GIT/input/regression
>
> encodingdefs.ps is unused if neither '-O TeX' nor '-O TeX-GS' is used on the
> command line.
>
> Checkout, make and install 12fe788, create a file test.ly:
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> {c''-.}
>
> Then compile with
>
> lilypond -O TeX --png --pdf test.pdf
Thanks.
I appreciate the time you have taken with me to explain this.
I went back and re-did the 'tests' I would have done with Malte's patch.
And now I can see it - the incorrect pizzicato glyph does show up. I simply
must have missed this when testing Malte's patch.
All I can do now is apologise to you (for all the extra explaining I made you
do) and to Malte for not spotting this at the time and the rest of the dev team
allowing this through. I guess I am just so used to using the test-distance reg
diff showing up only to show me the tests completed 'properly' - i.e if I don't
see this reg test diff show up I know the patch has gone wrong.
Thanks again (and to Phil for pointing out the 'bleeding' obvious).
At least the testing methodology is not fundamentally broken.
James
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
