On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 10:32:20AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Ralph Ronnquist, le jeu. 30 juil. 2026 18:26:32 +1000, a ecrit: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 09:21:01AM +0100, Bradley Morgan wrote: > > > On 30 July 2026 09:15:19 BST, Ralph Ronnquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 09:29:27AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > >> Ralph Ronnquist, le jeu. 30 juil. 2026 17:22:50 +1000, a ecrit: > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 06:29:51AM +0000, Damien Zammit wrote: > > > >> > > On Thursday, 07/30/26 at 16:14 Ralph Ronnquist <[email protected]> > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > You are confusing me. I sent an email with an attachment. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > You don't need to do that, that is what git send-email is for; it > > > >> > > is > > > >less likely to mangle the patch in general and makes the patch itself > > > >appear as mail on the list. > > > >> > > > > >> > Hmm. Are saying that the patch should be the body of the email, and > > > >> > not an attachment? > > > >> > > > >> But only if your mailer doesn't mangle the content of the patch. > > > >> > > > >> > That doesn't seem right. > > > >> > > > >> For on-mailing-list discussion on the code, that's the best approach > > > >> for > > > >> everybody to be able to easily discuss on the content. > > > > > > > >seems the git-email package is buggy on (my) debian hurd :( > > > > > > > > > > > Odd, how? > > > > It wants a Mail::Address perl module which isn't available. > > € apt-file search perl5/Mail/Address > libmailtools-perl: /usr/share/perl5/Mail/Address.pod > > Samuel
Yes, thanks. I didn't think that far :) Now I just need to figure out how to get it to save as an .eml (or something) rather than trying to send. Ralph.
