April 26, 2026 at 4:32 PM, "Milos Nikic" <[email protected] 
mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Milos%20Nikic%22%20%3Cnikic.milos%40gmail.com%3E
 > wrote:



> 
> To add I would love to hear if there are any issues on real hardware so that 
> we could address them promptly.
> Regards,
> Milos
> 
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2026, 1:31 PM Milos Nikic <[email protected] 
> mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hello Joshua,
> > I have been using it since the first patch was sent (that was why I was 
> > discovering so many issues at first).
> > 
> > And I got asked by 3 separate people on how to install it and turn it on 
> > etc since a while (after v5 so about 6 weeks ago).
> > 
> > I didn't get any more bug reports after V6.
> > 
> > But I got to say that I don't know who is using real hardware, I know don't 
> > (for now) and that is the only thing I can say for sure 

I'd be happy to try it on real hardware, but you might need to really help me 
figure out how to get
it all set up.  I suppose that I need to set up your development environment.  
You wrote
a script for that at some point...

> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > Milos
> > 
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2026, 12:53 PM <[email protected] 
> > mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > April 1, 2026 at 12:17 AM, "Milos Nikic" <[email protected] 
> > > mailto:[email protected]  mailto:[email protected] 
> > > mailto:[email protected] 
> > > ?to=%22Milos%20Nikic%22%20%3Cnikic.milos%40gmail.com http://40gmail.com/ 
> > > %3E > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Samuel,
> > > > Just dropping a quick ping on this v5 thread now that it's been a 
> > > > couple of weeks. 
> > > > 
> > > > Since sending it, I’ve (and some other people) continued stress-testing 
> > > > it and using it daily on top of all the patches that came through in 
> > > > between.
> > > 
> > > May I ask how many people are using the beta "ext3fs" on the Hurd?  Do we 
> > > have any real hardware testers?
> > > 
> > > > It works great but there is an assert that blows up on unjournaled 
> > > > mounts in v5 (as mentioned previously), and some compiler warnings when 
> > > > compiled on 32-bit and a rare deadlock that only triggers when the ring 
> > > > buffer reaches 100% saturation under synthetic I/O.
> > > 
> > > > I have the fixes for all of that ready in my local tree. They don't 
> > > > change the architecture at all!
> > > > To make your eventual review as easy as possible, how would you like me 
> > > > to handle them?
> > > > 
> > > > Should I send a v6 now with those fixes included, or hold onto them 
> > > > until you've had a chance to look at the core v5 architecture?
> > > > 
> > > > Best,
> > > > Milos
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to