Michael Kelly, le dim. 15 mars 2026 20:17:54 +0000, a ecrit: > On 14/03/2026 16:36, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Mike Kelly, le lun. 09 mars 2026 22:04:19 +0000, a ecrit: > > > Might it make the resident set for rumpdisk smaller too if parts of that > > > code > > > don't actually get used by Hurd? > > I guess the problem with rumpdisk is rather that we have not actually > > looked at its memory pool allocations, and have left it at very large > > values which don't make sense for a userland process. > > It has a resident set of over 200M on my machine and all (I think) wired. I > was imagining that some of it might not need to be wired or, like you say, > not needed at all.
If it's not wired, it may be swapped out, and then if it's needed, it can't be retrieved from the disk :) So it's either needed and then wired, or not needed :) Samuel
