Milos Nikic, le mer. 02 juil. 2025 09:01:04 -0700, a ecrit: > The async path came first because I noticed that the vast majority (90%+) of > generated events were utime updates.
We want to add relatime support :) > These seem well-suited to periodic async flushing (every few hundred > milliseconds), since they’re high-frequency but relatively low-value > — if a few timestamps are delayed or lost due to a crash, it's not a > disaster. Indeed. Probably worth checking what ext4 does about it. Samuel
