Sergey Bugaev, le lun. 21 oct. 2024 21:49:59 +0300, a ecrit: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 9:38 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > wrote: > > Sergey Bugaev, le lun. 21 oct. 2024 14:47:10 +0300, a ecrit: > > > You must > > > have a fresh enough MIG build (that already generates references to > > > mach_port_name_inlined_t), but older gnumach headers (that don't yet > > > define mach_port_name_inlined_t). > > > > "that don't yet define mach_port_name_inlined_t" ? > > > > Here it is missing the definition. I would on the contrary expect that > > his version of gnumach-dev is too old, missing mach_port_name_inlined_t. > > But that's the same thing I said?
Ah ok. > Perhaps the word "must" is what's confusing Yes :) > If that is indeed on a Debian GNU/Hurd system and the MIG and the Mach > headers in question are coming from system packages, He said we was using https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2023-01/msg00132.html Samuel
