Applied, thanks! Sergey Bugaev, le jeu. 19 sept. 2024 13:14:39 +0300, a ecrit: > A common use case of access () / faccessat () is checking for file > existence, not any specific access permissions. In that case, we can > avoid doing the file_check_access () RPC; whether the given path had > been successfully resolved to a file is all we need to know to answer. > > This is prompted by GLib switching to use faccessat (F_OK) to implement > g_file_query_exists () for local files. > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/4272 > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <buga...@gmail.com> > --- > sysdeps/mach/hurd/faccessat.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/faccessat.c b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/faccessat.c > index 998e31962..6d3d123ab 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/faccessat.c > +++ b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/faccessat.c > @@ -185,6 +185,15 @@ __faccessat_common (int fd, const char *file, int type, > int at_flags, > return errfunc (err); > } > > + /* If all we wanted was to check for a file existing at the path, > + then we already got our answer, and we don't need to call > + file_check_access (). */ > + if (type == F_OK) > + { > + __mach_port_deallocate (__mach_task_self (), io); > + return 0; > + } > + > /* Find out what types of access we are allowed to this file. */ > err = __file_check_access (io, &allowed); > __mach_port_deallocate (__mach_task_self (), io); > -- > 2.46.1
-- Samuel <T> csp.tar.gz: ascii text -+- #ens-mim - vive les browsers qui prennent des initiatives à la con -+-
