Il 29/12/23 15:20, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
Luca Dariz, le jeu. 28 déc. 2023 20:42:58 +0100, a ecrit:+ +#define align_inline(val, n) { val = align(val, n); }Rather name it ALIGN_INLINE, so people don't mistake this for a function (that doesn't have side-effects on its parameters).
ok
+void +run_test_simple(void *msg, mach_msg_size_t msglen, mach_msg_id_t msgid) +{ + mach_msg_header_t *head = msg; + mach_port_t port, receive; + int err; + + err = syscall_mach_port_allocate (mach_task_self (), + MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE, &port); + ASSERT_RET(err, "syscall_mach_port_allocate"); + + err = syscall_mach_port_allocate (mach_task_self (), + MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE, &receive); + ASSERT_RET(err, "syscall_mach_port_allocate 2"); + + struct echo_params params; + params.rx_port = port; + params.rx_size = msglen; + params.rx_number = 1; + test_thread_start (mach_task_self (), echo_thread, ¶ms); + msleep(100);Is this msleep really needed? If yes, this is racy. If it's just to make the test a bit more stressful, then ok.
not really, I'll remove it Luca
