Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 07 mai 2023 10:53:14 +0300, a ecrit:
> On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 2:35 AM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> 
> wrote:
> > Sergey Bugaev, le mar. 02 mai 2023 17:10:17 +0300, a ecrit:
> > > As for the best way to implement this... I have always thought gnumach
> > > should have a bootscript directive to expose a multiboot module as a
> > > memobj. Then there would be a task, /hurd/ramdisk, that would expose
> > > it over the device (and possibly I/O) protocols:
> > >
> > > module /boot/initrd.img $(initrd-image=vm-object-create)
> >
> > So to release the content you would just close the port? That looks
> > interesting to me indeed.
> >
> > But do we really need this intermediate translator? libstore already
> > has a memobj backend, so it would probably be a matter of passing
> > memobj:$(initrd-image=vm-object-create)
> 
> Indeed! Wouldn't that be neat? :)
> 
> But not memobj:$(initrd-image=vm-object-create); rather like this:
> 
> module /boot/initrd.img $(initrd-image=vm-object-create)
> module /hurd/ext2fs.static ext2fs other-args -T memobj ${initrd-image}
> $(task-create) $(task-resume)

Right, sure :)

Samuel

Reply via email to