Hi! Il 18/02/23 21:37, Sergey Bugaev ha scritto:
+struct i386_fsgs_base_state {
+ unsigned long fs_base;
+ unsigned long gs_base;
+};
The fs and gs registers are also set by i386_REGS_SEGS_STATE. If they are better set separately (as it seems from the other patch, but I don't really know the glibc hurd part) should we remove them from the i386_REGS_SEGS_STATE case for x86_64, to avoid conflicts?
Luca
