Luca, le mar. 04 oct. 2022 22:39:03 +0200, a ecrit: > Il 30/08/22 07:57, Luca ha scritto: > > Il 28/08/22 15:13, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > > > + size_t n = size / 8; > > > > + saddr += n*number; > > > > + usize += n*number; > > > > + align_inline(saddr, 4); > > > > + align_inline(usize, 4); > > > > > > This should be alignof(some_align_type) > > > > > > Will do. > > Thinking about it, I'm not sure about alignof(). For example, if I add > something like > > #define MACH_MSG_ALIGNMENT alignof(rpc_vm_offset_t) > > then I'm assuming that the alignment of a data type with a given size is the > same on 32-bit and 64-bit variants. While this is true on x86 up to 4-byte > size, it's not true for 8-byte size. Specifically, on 32-bit this would be
Mmm, good point. > For me it would be less confusing to just define it as 4. Ok, but in a macro, please :) So it's not spread along the code, but in a place that will be easy to fix for various architectures. Samuel
