Applied, thanks! Guy-Fleury Iteriteka, le lun. 30 mai 2022 22:01:05 +0200, a ecrit: > --- > open_issues/pth.mdwn | 28 ---------------------------- > 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 open_issues/pth.mdwn > > diff --git a/open_issues/pth.mdwn b/open_issues/pth.mdwn > deleted file mode 100644 > index 12bf509..0000000 > --- a/open_issues/pth.mdwn > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ > -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, > -Inc."]] > - > -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable > -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify > this > -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 > or > -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no > Invariant > -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the > license > -is included in the section entitled > -[[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] > - > -[[!tag open_issue_porting]] > - > -IRC, unknown channel, unknown date. > - > - <azeem> seems pth still doesn't work > - <bddebian> Doesn't build or doesn't work? > - <azeem> both > - <azeem> some configure test keep grinding the CPU, same for the test > suite > - <azeem> which apparently runs pth_init() and never returns > - > - <azeem> actually, pth fails to build right now > - <azeem> pth_mctx.c:477: error: request for member '__pc' in something > not a structure or union > - > - <azeem> I know the pth test suite fails (it locks up the machine) or > used to fail, so I guess porting work for pth would be needed > - <azeem> < marcusb> from reading the pth/PORTING document, porting libpth > shouldn't be too hard... > - > - <youpi> dropped pth [from the channel's topic], as we think we know why > it fails (sigaltstack is bogus) > -- > 2.30.2 > >
-- Samuel --- Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse ! Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.
