Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:57:42 -0400, a ecrit: > > @@ -1106,12 +1109,12 @@ inf_validate_procs (struct inf *inf) > > if (inferior_ptid == ptid_t (inf->pid)) > > /* This is the first time we're hearing about thread > > ids, after a fork-child. */ > > - thread_change_ptid (inferior_ptid, ptid); > > + thread_change_ptid (gnu_target, inferior_ptid, ptid); > > > I think it would have been more straightforward and clean to use > `inf->process_target ()` > (assuming it's the correct thing to do), given that you have access to the > appropriate > inferior everywhere you made changes.
I didn't see a way to access the inferior here (inf is a gnu-nat.c-specific structure with no link to struct inferior) > But I also see that you've pretty much replicated what the linux-nat target > does Yes, that seemed simpler to stick along what Linux is currently doing. Samuel
