Attached Hurd patch (without guards)
El dom., 27 oct. 2019 a las 21:03, Almudena Garcia (<
liberamenso10...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > Ok, that looks good :)
> Don't we need to patch Hurd with the new field?
> My previous Hurd patch is not good, I remember
>
>
> El dom., 27 oct. 2019 a las 21:00, Samuel Thibault (<
> samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>) escribió:
>
>> Almudena Garcia, le dim. 27 oct. 2019 20:53:30 +0100, a ecrit:
>> > Improved tabs.
>>
>> Ok, that looks good :)
>>
>> Now you need to write a changelog. See git log for instances: some
>> description at the top (can be just a one-liner), then the description
>> of the _source code changes_.
>>
>> Now, I'm realizing that you have not assigned copyright for your
>> work. For this commit it is not required because it is very small and
>> straightforward, but before we can integrate any of your SMP work, we
>> have to get it. I'll send you a separate mail for this.
>>
>> Samuel
>>
>>
--- hurd/procfs/process.c 2019-10-26 23:12:40.495359917 +0200
+++ hurd~/procfs/process.c 2019-10-27 21:07:51.088920405 +0100
@@ -221,14 +221,15 @@
struct procinfo *pi = proc_stat_proc_info (ps);
task_basic_info_t tbi = proc_stat_task_basic_info (ps);
thread_basic_info_t thbi = proc_stat_thread_basic_info (ps);
+ thread_sched_info_t thsi = proc_stat_thread_sched_info (ps);
const char *fn = args_filename (proc_stat_args (ps));
@@ -286,7 +287,7 @@
(long unsigned) proc_stat_thread_rpc (ps), /* close enough */
0L, 0L,
0,
- 0,
+ (long unsigned) thbi->last_processor,
0, 0,
0LL);
}
