> I didn't check It, but now I'll check ps -e doesn't return any netdde process.
> Did you try rtl8139 instead for instance? Now I'm trying It, but It shows the same problem. El jue., 4 jul. 2019 a las 23:32, Almudena Garcia (< liberamenso10...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > After boot, before running the settrans command, is a netdde > > process still running? You could also make sure no one is running before > > running the settrans command by killing any that would still be running. > > I didn't check It, but now I'll check > > > Did you try rtl8139 instead for instance? > > Nope, I didn't try It, Only e1000 and pcnet, > Btw, In my SMP kernel, I need a model which driver is inside Mach, because > netdde drivers use to crash in It. > > El jue., 4 jul. 2019 a las 23:28, Samuel Thibault (< > samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>) escribió: > >> Almudena Garcia, le jeu. 04 juil. 2019 23:18:21 +0200, a ecrit: >> > I attach the full output of the command >> >> So the e1000 driver doesn't find the card, that's where the issue would >> be. Possibly the boot-time netdde crashes and leaves the card in a very >> odd state. After boot, before running the settrans command, is a netdde >> process still running? You could also make sure no one is running before >> running the settrans command by killing any that would still be running. >> >> Did you try rtl8139 instead for instance? >> >> Samuel >> >
