Joseph Myers, on jeu. 18 janv. 2018 16:47:55 +0000, wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Not all of them are necessary for managing to build glibc. Some of them > > are just hacking, others are perhaps almost ready to commit, just > > missing changelogs & formatting. That's the triaging thing that takes > > time, and having to do all the work including changelogs & formatting > > makes it get lower in my global TODOlist. > > I'm still arguing on bug-standards for removing the requirement for > ChangeLog format (given a public distributed version control system), but > that wouldn't remove the requirement for proper explanations of patches,
Thomas: this is were your help should be focused. Some of your branches only have "WIP", which is not helpful to know what you were hacking when writing them. Samuel
