Hello, David Michael, on dim. 12 mars 2017 19:43:40 -0700, wrote: > A few of the socket-related functions in glibc don't seem to return > ENOTSOCK. Would it be more "correct" to return this as opposed to > EMIG_BAD_ID? In particular, can at least send() be made to return > ENOTSOCK for PulseAudio compatibility? The following example uses > both MIG_BAD_ID and EOPNOTSUPP as some other functions do, although > I've only seen it return EMIG_BAD_ID.
Oh indeed, thanks for the suggestion, now commited upstream and in Debian. Samuel
