Hello,
About the port leak in select discussed on IRC, I checked history a bit,
this (000ef460744786571f51604e6de631b7168e239a):
- if (d[i].type)
+ if (d[i].type & ~SELECT_ERROR)
__mach_port_destroy (__mach_task_self (), d[i].reply_port);
was added when handling EBADF , for which there is no reply port to
destroy. Then I added this (099f8d2b7ecedc4f6fc895d2c35912f995289c24):
- if (d[i].type & ~SELECT_ERROR)
+ if (d[i].type & ~(SELECT_ERROR | SELECT_RETURNED))
__mach_port_destroy (__mach_task_self (), d[i].reply_port);
For the case where io_select returns an error. Yesterday evening I
didn't remember which case this was, but IIRC that's when a tty gets
io_revoke()d, in which case the RPC doesn't happen at all since the
target port was destroyed.
I guess we could simply do this:
for (i = firstfd; i <= lastfd; ++i)
- if (d[i].type & ~SELECT_ERROR)
+ if (d[i].type & SELECT_ERROR)
+ {
+ d[i].reply_port = MACH_PORT_NULL;
+ }
else
{
int type = d[i].type;
d[i].reply_port = __mach_reply_port ();
as well as in the error case of __io_select_request, and then just check
against MACH_PORT_NULL before destroy.
Samuel
