Ludovic Courtès, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 10:02:36 +0200, wrote: > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> skribis: > > Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote: > >> > Yes, but our current glibc tree is based on glibc 2.22, as guix needs > >> > it. > >> > >> FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for GNU/Linux (we’re currently > >> in the process of switching from 2.23 to 2.24), and we’d prefer to have > >> the same version on both GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd, modulo the > >> Hurd-specific patches. > > > > So it's now 2.23. When Guix switched to 2.24 for Linux, please tell me, > > I'll update the tree to 2.24. > > It’s already done in a branch that is being built (hopefully merged > within a week or so). > > So you could go ahead and just let us know which tarballs or commits we > should be using for each version. Is that fine with you? Manolis,
For 2.23, the tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker is ready. Samuel
