Samuel Thibault, on Mon 18 Apr 2016 21:50:16 +0200, wrote: > > I also have the implementation for what glibc calls > > 'low-level lock' i.e. a wrapper around something like futex. That can be > > integrated into glibc to replace spin locks where needed as well. > > Ah, cool, indeed :) > > Also, the spin_lock functions from glibc/mach's spin-lock.h could be > made to use it instead of calling __swtch_pri().
Also, it should now be easy to implement sem_open(), which we still lack, and that is posing portability issues. Samuel
