Samuel Thibault, on Tue 19 Apr 2016 12:18:01 +0200, wrote: > Svante Signell, on Tue 19 Apr 2016 12:08:07 +0200, wrote: > > > Looking at ps -feMj, it seems that it's ext2fs which consumes much more > > > CPU time, thus increasing overall wallclock time. It'd probably be > > > interesting to profile ext2fs, to see what takes longer. Perhaps it's > > > the hash table which is less efficient since with the new page cache > > > policy there are much more cached files? > > > > Are you preparing ext2fs for profiling? .../pkg-glibc/glibc: hurd-i386: Fix > > recording profiling from ext2fs > > Yes. I just got the results, attached here.
I have now pushed a wiki page for profiling the kernel, which is more involved: http://darnassus.sceen.net/~hurd-web/microkernel/mach/gnumach/profiling/ The glibc build is going on, results available later :) Samuel
