Hello, Thanks for the pending patches notices!
David Michael, le Tue 06 Oct 2015 17:49:00 -0400, a écrit : > This one avoids problems with a symbol that is also provided by libpthread: > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/tg-libc_getspecific.diff?view=co What problem does it actually solve? Apparently I didn't put enough comments to remember what this is about. AIUI, it should be working fine already since this non-weak __libc_getspecific function calls cthread_getspecific, which calls pthread_getspecific. > I haven't checked if there's a new Debian patch for this, but there is > an IS_IN macro from the future (build failure) since commit 8042775. > Use IS_IN_rtld instead: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/glibc.git/tree/sysdeps/mach/hurd/cthreads.c?h=tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker#n23 Ah, right, this patch was for 2.22. In Debian we have different versions of this change according to the version. Since Whittaker is still based on 2.19, I have added the fix. > Also, I believe either you or Samuel told me at some point that > task_notify should be built in libmachuser instead of the proc server. Yes. I didn't realize the change was still not done in glibc. I've now pushed to upstream and our topgit. I'll commit to Debian after a build test (for the new symbols). > and you can drop Debian's Hurd patch? Yes. > (Note to packagers that this will make glibc install a new file, > <mach/task_notify.h>.) That's not a problem. Thanks, Samuel
