2015-09-17 12:35 GMT-03:00 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>: > Diego Nieto Cid, le Thu 17 Sep 2015 12:25:21 -0300, a écrit : >> In that way there are several sound related translators separating the >> concerns >> while the hardwarde is still accessed by a single translator avoiding the >> conflicts Robert mentioned. > > Which conflict? >
>From what he said > The other problem I had is that I don't know how to make a single translator > service two separate device nodes (obviously you don't want to start a > different Rump instance for /dev/audio, /dev/mixer, etc as they would fight > each other trying to access the same hardware) I understood he was trying to avoid having to access the hardware simultaneously from different translator instances because rump would conflict on opening the device, etc.
