Ludovic Courtès, le Wed 24 Jun 2015 23:33:21 +0200, a écrit : > Manolis Ragkousis <manolis...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > On 24 June 2015 at 12:17, Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > >>> and the same command with the tarballs sources end up with > >>> > >>> http://paste.lisp.org/display/150437 > >> > >> That looks like <https://sourceware.org/PR15605>, > >> <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3CE1VU3KH-00083u-04%40vasks.debian.org%3E>, > >> <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3CE1VU9tp-0007UR-IS%40vasks.debian.org%3E>. > > > > Applied unsubmitted-NO_HIDDEN.diff, in the tarball source, built with > > "-enable-add-ons=libpthread --enable-pt_chown --disable-nscd > > CFLAGS=-O2 --host=i586-gnu --build=i586-gnu" > > and I got a working static binary :-D > > It would be nice to see if it’s the patch that’s “fixing the issue” or > if it’s using i586 rather than i686.
I think both: with i686 we don't have the NO_HIDDEN issue, but the static link issue, and with i586, we don't have the static link issue, but we have the NO_HIDDEN issue. And we should have CI builds to catch both :) Samuel
