Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-11-21 01:50:15)
> Justus Winter, le Wed 12 Nov 2014 16:49:08 +0100, a écrit :
> > +kern_return_t
> > +register_new_task_notification(
> > + const host_t host,
> > + ipc_port_t notification)
> > +{
> > + if (host == HOST_NULL)
> > + return KERN_INVALID_HOST;
> > +
> > + if (new_task_notification != NULL)
> > + return KERN_NO_ACCESS;
> > +
> > + new_task_notification = notification;
> > + return KERN_SUCCESS;
> > +}
>
> Mmm, doesn't this need some additional reference on the notification
> port? Of course, proc is not supposed to die, but better be safe than
> sorry :)
Hum, please clarify. I thought the message carries a reference that
we can keep? There is no destructor function for host_priv_t.
Justus
