Svante Signell, le Tue 19 Aug 2014 07:05:34 +0200, a écrit : > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:31 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Furthermore the following two large file system tests fail when building > > manually: > > (on the buildd they are skipped. How come, is that image not compiled with > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64?): > > t/op/lfs.t > > not ok 17 > > # Failed test 17 - at op/lfs.t line 229 > > # got "big" > > # expected "\000\000\000" > > and > > ../ext/Fcntl/t/syslfs.t ........................................... 1/? > > # Failed test at t/syslfs.t line 230. > > # got: 'big' > > # expected: '' > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 17. > > ../ext/Fcntl/t/syslfs.t ........................................... > > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > > Failed 1/17 subtests > > > > I can submit bugs with patches to skip these two tests, OK? > > Samuel, you did not comment on this one. Is the buildd hurd built > without _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 set?
I don't really have an opinion on this. There is nothing particular in the buildds environment which would set or unset _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. Samuel
