Marin Ramesa, le Thu 05 Dec 2013 22:03:44 +0100, a écrit : > * kern/act.c (null_act): Comment unused variable.
Well, it is used, by being initialized. The comment above explains what it's used for. > * kern/act.h (null_act): Likewise. > > --- > kern/act.c | 2 +- > kern/act.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kern/act.c b/kern/act.c > index 321ff98..61b982e 100644 > --- a/kern/act.c > +++ b/kern/act.c > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static Act free_acts[ACT_STATIC_KLUDGE]; > > As you might expect, most of its members have no particular value. > alerts is zero. */ > -Act null_act; > +/* Act null_act; */ > > void > global_act_init() > diff --git a/kern/act.h b/kern/act.h > index e064724..cddf6c7 100644 > --- a/kern/act.h > +++ b/kern/act.h > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ void act_init(void); > kern_return_t act_terminate_task_locked(struct Act *act); > > /* Exported to thread.c */ > -extern Act null_act; > +/* extern Act null_act; */ > kern_return_t act_create_kernel(Act **out_act); > > /* Exported to machine-dependent activation code */ > -- > 1.8.1.4 > > -- Samuel There are two types of Linux developers - those who can spell, and those who can't. There is a constant pitched battle between the two. (From one of the post-1.1.54 kernel update messages posted to c.o.l.a)
