Hi Pedro! On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:01:39 +0100, Pedro Alves <pal...@redhat.com> wrote: > By inspection, I noticed that when I made the gnu-nat use > ptid(pid,0,tid) to represent a thread, instead of using ptid(tid,0,0), > in <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-08/msg00175.html>, I > introduced a bug. > > The change was: [...]
> So before, [...] > > The right fix is to compare the whole ptid to minus_one_ptid, of > course. > > Completely untested, but I think it's obvious enough, so I went ahead > and put it in. Thanks! Now confirmed the issue as well as the fix. As I found some months ago, Hurd GDB's signal-thread detection is broken anyway, but despite that, GDB does work -- will have to look into that. Grüße, Thomas
pgpoayEKtgLaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
