On 10.07.2013 14:14:29, Marin Ramesa wrote: > Use new .h files in cleanup of db_command.c.
I noticed that these four patches are very similar to what was done in XNU. Now, I don't know if they should be applied to GNU Mach, I'm not a legal expert, so I don't know if this patches are a copyright violation of some kind. Or they are just too trivial for that. I mean, the function prototypes and include directives do not match exactly, since it's a different version of Mach, but the layout of the new .h files is the same. It's logical to organize debug print functions into *-print.h files and to write .h files in such a way. Everyone would do it, since writing a prototype is just modifying from an existing function definition and it's nothing original. I don't know. If these patches are a copyright violation I wouldn't apply them to a publicly available source repository.
