On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 09:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 08:39:39 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 00:31 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 00:18:16 +0100, a écrit :
> > 
> > > > > I don't understand what you mean.  What delay are you talking about?
> > > > > The only delay in by branch is the delay requested by the user.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, with my code I need a timeout of 1ms for poll, with the old code I
> > > > don't.
> > > 
> > > That 1ms is completely got ridden of by Richard's changes. I don't
> > > understand what problem you are still seeing.
> > 
> > I know that Richards changes solve the problem by moving the timeouts to
> > the server.
> 
> Ok, so there is actually no problem.

The only issue would be that the changes will not be available in
2.13-39+ (wheezy) but 2.17+ (wheezy+1), right?



Reply via email to