Svante Signell, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 15:56:33 +0100, a écrit : > > He said he rebooted in between. He must have some other /server passive > > entry to pflocal.new. > > Any ideas on how to get rid of the passive translator > at /hurd/pflocal.new. I can kill the active one, but the passive?
As I said, you need to find which filesystem entry has a passive record targetted at /hurd/pflocal.new. > Especially if both are referred to by /servers/socket/1 /servers/socket/1 can have only one passive record, not two. Use showtrans to get it. Since you have two pflocal processes, you must be having another filesystem entry with the other /hurd/pflocal* passive translator record. Do you perhaps have a chroot on that system? Samuel
