At Tue, 7 Aug 2012 23:55:12 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > It's generic code. At least glibc keeps generic code around, if I > > recall correctly. Further, one of the very nice things about this > > libpthread is that it is really easy to integrate into a new OS (or > > even use in a kernel). It would be a shame to lose that feature. > > But, as I'm not doing the work, you are welcome to evict this code to > > make your life easier. > > I kept it in, no problem. In the effort to build the x86/Hurd/Mach > libpthread as part of the glibc build, we'll have to invent some sysdeps > mechanism so that the libpthread signal implementation is not preferred > over the real glibc implementation, which is a problem Samuel had, as I > understand it, but that should be doable.
If it is a burden, just remove it. Neal
