On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:30:52 +0200, a écrit : > > the icon package FTBFS due to a missing . in PATH. Other architectures > > does not have this problem. According to Samuel the problem is missing > > info from glibc to the exec server about $0. > > > > In May-June 2010 Emilio Pozuelo monfort proposed a set of patches to > > glibc and the exec server by adding two new RPCs > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-05/msg00108.html > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-06/msg00002.html > > Yes. It's also the reason for a bunch of testsuite failures, notably > glib. I spent time on adding the patch to glibc this week-end, and > currently adding it to the hurd package now.
So this patch is now allowed in glibc, fine! Or is it only Debian? > Good news is: as hoped, icon now passes the testsuite fine! > > I'm finalizing the patches, will upload the hurd package, eglibc > will build, then rebuild hurd, and then icon should build fine, then > ifupdown. Good news indeed. Congratulations!
