On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 20:40 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > because the more you ask me things, the less I have time to > > > spend on other things, such as the dhcp patch which I still haven't > > > found any time to work on. > > > > I could do that if you agree that we go back the the get_hw_address > > patch I first submitted is a better way to resolve the upstream doubts > > than your updated version. > > Problem is that if I proposed something else, it's most probably because > I believed that it was better, and more acceptable for upstream.
I can do whatever you choose would be best accepted upstream, or you submit an updated patch yourself. I think this issue should have been solved a long time ago. This is ridiculous, how peoples honest (and correct) contributions are just being ignored.... Well, the license is BSD, right? However, forking would be extremely unfortunate (and unrealistic).
