Samuel Thibault, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 15:14:11 +0100, a écrit : > Richard Braun, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 15:12:50 +0100, a écrit : > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:35:29AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > (Naturally, the result would be non-portable for systems where > > > > fork==vfork, > > > > but then maybe implementing vfork as fork is the bug? ;-)) > > > > > > It's what the norm says. > > > > I think you meant the norm explicitely says vfork can be implemented as > > fork. > > Yes, which is sufficient for what you said.
I meant what *he* said. Samuel
