Hi! On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:38:29 +0200, <olafbuddenha...@gmx.net> wrote: > Another week has passed, another IRC meeting ahead -- as usual on > Wednesday (i.e. today) at 19:00 UTC, irc.freenode.net channel #hurd.
I'll be late due to another (in-person, real-life) meeting, but I should be able to make it to about 20:00 UTC. > And perhaps someone wants to talk about Hurd at GHM :-) That'd be nice, indeed. (I have not yet checked last two weeks IRC logs.) > Also I just learned about debbugs.gnu.org, and would like to discuss > whether we could use it instead of the atrocious Savannah tracker. In case this is discussed before I show up: I do agree (and in fact thought about this before). The other ``system'' that I always had in mind and have implemented, but which I mainly am the sole user of is this: <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/open_issues.html>, which basically is just free-form text enriched by some tags for grouping, editable via the web and through Git commit. But I do agree that a more traditional system (like the Savannah trackers or the new debbugs) do have their advantages, too, so perhaps there's a niche for both these and ``my'' Open Issues. Without thinking more than three seconds about it, comparing to the Savannah trackers, the debbugs interface has three advantages: it can be operated by email, Debian people (developers and users) already know how to use it, and it just cannot be any worse. Grüße, Thomas
pgpMo9aqt2vbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
