Svante Signell, le Tue 16 Aug 2011 10:20:25 +0200, a écrit : > > > Or should build dependencies for these archs avoid it? > > > > Probably. > > Which is best, to create a dummy package or file bugs for every package > reverse depending on it? > > According to > # apt-cache rdepends libcap2|wc -l > 103 > > Interesting packages: zsh, bind9, syslog-ng, wodim, smbclient, > pulseaudio*, gnome-keyring, ntpdate, etc.
A lot of which *already* have [linux-any] or [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64] or | not+linux-gnu in the dependency (the former is the preferred form). Better use grep-aptavail -FBuild-Depends -sPackage,Build-Depends -n "libcap" mySources | paste -sd " \n" | sed -e 's/^\([^ ]*\) .*, \(libcap[^,]*\).*$/\1: \2/' | grep -v hurd-i386 | grep -v linux-any | grep -v not+linux-gnu | grep -v libcapi which gives way less packages: asterisk: libcap-dev (>= 1:2.16-4) | libcap2-dev autodir: libcap-dev bluez: libcap-ng-dev eucalyptus: libcap-dev ltp: libcap2-bin lxc: libcap-dev (>= 1:2.17-2) libexplain: libcap-dev libvirt: libcap-ng-dev mcstrans: libcap2-dev mumble: libcap-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64] nepenthes: libcap2-dev nfs-utils: libcap-dev python-prctl: libcap-dev (>= 2) quagga: libcap-dev setools: libcap-dev strongswan: libcap-dev suricata: libcap-ng-dev vdr: libcap2-dev | libcap-dev virtualbox-ose: libcap-dev zorp: libcap-dev quite a few of which probably can't be built on hurd-i386 anyway: bluez, ltp, nfs-utils, virtualbox-ose, ... And one of which already has the arch-specific qualifier, just not for hurd-i386. Samuel
