On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > Jérémie Koenig, le Wed 29 Jun 2011 22:55:48 +0000, a écrit : >> The old !SA_SIGINFO case was a non-standard (BSD-based?) extension. Is >> there really anything using it? > > You can never know. And thus probably have to keep it.
Would mapping the old values to the new ones in the trampoline code be an acceptable compromise? Should I rename the constants so that programs using them would fail to compile, and therefore be noticed and, hopefully, updated to the more portable SA_SIGINFO interface? Would it still be ok to introduce POSIX sigcodes where 0 was used before? -- Jérémie Koenig <j...@jk.fr.eu.org> http://jk.fr.eu.org/
