Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 May 2011 18:45:12 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, le Thu 05 May 2011 15:44:03 +0200, a écrit : > > It could simply be symlinks, couldn't it? I don't see what translator > > could be started. All that is possibly a bit non-standard is that we use > > chroot a lot in a secondary ext2fs (which is the one that is leaking, > > the / one is not) > > What I can however observe is ports in other translators: after 17h > building stuff, here are the number of ports: > > / ext2fs: ~9000, mostly receive > pflocal: ~30000, mostly send > defaultpager: ~38000, mostly send > chroot ext2fs: ~100000, mostly receive > pfinet: ~57000, mostly send
(of course, there are only about one or two hundred other running processes, without so many open ports) Samuel
