Thomas Schmitt, le Sun 10 Apr 2011 20:42:53 +0200, a écrit : > (Shall i stop CC'ing help-hurd ?)
It's not useful indeed. > Its own usage model is command-and-reply. Like a shell script or dialog > session. Seems to fit nicely into > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/mig.html > (Am i too stupid to see the links to tutorials and manuals ?) There's the "Documentation" link on this page which I believe has all the links that exist. > Only that xorriso is *fat*. At least for an OS driver candidate. > I would not dare to propose it to any of the usual kernel communities. > > So what is Hurd's attitude towards a driver that occupies 2.5 MB > of memory when idle and might expand much more on the job ? > Is it worth to continue thinking about xorriso-in-the-system ? Not a problem in a Hurdish mind. The stuff can be split in low-level driver which just does the SCSI commands and a daemon which does the big stuff, run as mere user. Samuel
