Hi,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jérémie Koenig, le Sat 12 Jun 2010 19:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > @@ -128,7 +129,7 @@
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > - int i, losers, maxlen;
> > + int i, losers;
> >
> > /* Initialize boot script variables. We leak these send rights. */
> > losers = boot_script_set_variable
> > @@ -219,23 +220,19 @@
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > - maxlen = 0;
> > for (i = 0; i < boot_info.mods_count; ++i)
> > {
> > int err;
> > char *line = (char*)phystokv(bmods[i].string);
> > - int len = strlen (line) + 1;
> > - if (len > maxlen)
> > - maxlen = len;
> > - printf ("\rmodule %d: %*s", i, -maxlen, line);
> > + printf ("module %d: %s\n", i, line);
> > err = boot_script_parse_line (&bmods[i], line);
> > if (err)
> > {
> > - printf ("\n\tERROR: %s", boot_script_error_string (err));
> > + printf ("\tERROR: %s\n", boot_script_error_string (err));
> > ++losers;
> > }
> > }
> > - printf ("\r%d multiboot modules %*s", i, -maxlen, "");
> > + printf ("%d multiboot modules\n", i);
> > if (losers)
> > panic ("%d of %d boot script commands could not be parsed",
> > losers, boot_info.mods_count);
>
> These seem unrelated, right? I guess they should be submitted and
> commited upstream separately.
If I remember correctly they're actually kindof related, because I needed those
for the ramdisk message to be displayed correctly.
> I have commited the patch, without the change above, in the Debian
> package.
Okay, thanks!
--
Jérémie Koenig <j...@jk.fr.eu.org>
