Update of bug #28383 (project hurd):
Status: None => Wont Fix
Reproducibility: None => Every Time
Summary: Non-compliant access behavior? => Supplementary
groups aren't use by access()
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
It is believed that gcc should just not use access() in the first
place.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28383>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
