Hi, On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:21:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> According to what Thomas has suggested, I have pushed my code to the > unionfs git repository (git://git.sv.gnu.org/hurd/unionfs.git) in a > topic branch (master-unionmount). That's not a topic branch. Topic branches are essentially individual patch series. This is a traditional branch, containing a cumulative development history. While I do think that such main a "unionmount" branch is probably a good idea, it should contain only the "approved" patches; while those still in development would better be placed in true topic branches... -antrik-
