Hi, Am Montag, 28. September 2009 10:16:15 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > > > Note that as opposed to some other translators (like Zheng's > > > eth-multiplexer), both unionfs and nsmux were designed to be > > > stand-alone, > > > > ...which is the reason why I still haven't tested nsmux -- I'm still > > waiting for you to integrate it in the Hurd tree > > That doesn't make any sense. If you're interested: just get the source > code and run make. Why does it need to be part of the Hurd code > conglomerate in order for you being able to test it? And yes: they > should remain stand-alone. I will integrate these packages into our git > repositories soonish.
Maybe it would help testing to have a README in the new LiveCD which says, which commandline commands to use to test the translators (down to simple copy paste) - including a list of interesting translators. > > And the last question is about the integration itself: how exactly do > > I take my nsmux git repository and integrate it into the Hurd git > > repository? > > You don't; I'll do. But not into the main Hurd repository. Does that mean it'll simply get into one of the subrepositories? Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. - Arne (http://draketo.de) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
