Hello! On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:40:36PM +0100, I wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 02:35:14PM +0100, I wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:29AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > > > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > >Driving both a homepage, <http://hurd.gnu.org/>, that is very > > > >infrequently updated, plus a wiki, (read-only mirror available at > > > ><http://www.thomas.schwinge.homeip.net/hurd-wiki/>), that gets some more > > > >care, seems a bit too much. So what about merging them? > > > > > > I'm really fine either way. I feel really bad that this has happened as > > > I was told by some colleagues that Verizon was not blocking port 80. In > > > one case I think it makes a great deal of sense. The only thing I liked > > > about having it on my boxen was that it was actually running on Hurd so > > > it showed people that it isn't just vaporware. > > > > These pages will continue to be rendered on one of your boxen. The wiki > > infrastructure will be kept running there just as before -- only with the > > web server reacting to requests from a a different port. (Hereby starts > > the contest of getting consensus about which port to use. Barry has a > > veto right.) > > Now. Which port to use? 666?
To come to an end here, Barry, please select a port to use for the <http://www.bddebian.com:PORT/~wiki/>-style URLS. Then configure your router for forwarding this port to 192.168.10.62, which is the IP of the webserver-to-be, running on zenhost as a domU, and which is going to replace the dedicated shitbox machine. Speaking of zenhost, what can we do about the port 2260 forwarding problem? Try using a different port? Is 2260 also documented as being blocked by your ISP as well? (You have received/read/undersigned the terms and conditions, not me.) I can do neither of these without your cooperation. Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
