Hello, While I'm not currently involved with the Hurd, I do plan to change that. (This also means that I missed discussion on bug-hurd, since I only read hurd-devel at the moment.) However, I shall still only be involved with the new Hurd, not with the Mach version. So my opinion should probably not count as strong.
I have experience only with cvs and svn, and I strongly prefer svn. When I used cvs I thought it was pretty decent, but since I'm using svn I don't want to go back. I think using svn would be a great improvement. In particular, as mentioned, the atomic commit and the ability to prepare patches without network is attractive to me. That said, I have no opinion on using decentralised systems, since I don't know them. However, if they are considered the best, but it is impractical to make the switch, going from cvs to svn would still be well worth it IMO. Thanks, Bas Wijnen -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
