Samuel Thibault, le Thu 09 Aug 2007 02:29:17 +0200, a écrit : > 0e881000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > * > 0e8815a0 7240 001c a460 001c 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0e8815b0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0e8815c0 0000 0000 15c4 0e88 15e0 0e88 0041 0000 > 0e8815d0 0000 0000 0091 0000 000f 0000 0000 0000 > 0e8815e0 0001 0000 0000 0000 15a0 0e88 0001 0000 > 0e8815f0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > * > 0e881660 0000 0000 06b9 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > 0e881670 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > * > > and repeats every 0x748, one per exec() call. Yes, there is a sort of > > start: 40 72 1C 00 60 4A 1C 00 00.... > here: &here > &there > 41 00 00... 91 00.. 0F 00.. > there: 01, 0s > &start > 01 00.. > B9 96 00..
It can be noted too that 0x6b9 up to the next 0x91 is 0x6b9 bytes, and that 0x1c and 0x0f are exactly the number of following 0s. Samuel _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
