At Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:13:34 -0400 (EDT), Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I realize no matter what we do, people are going to be upset, but its > hurting the project as a whole staying on CVS.
It's delusional to think that the problems of the Hurd are related to a choice of the version control system. > Anyway, as a general comprise, why don't we simply move to SVN (while not > actively stated, Savannah does host Subversion repos, it needs to be > turned on in the project preferences by a project admin; How is this done? > most DVCS > can work with a subversion backend (the major expection being monotone, > and mercural; git, bzr, and svk can use subversion as a backend) and the > learning curve of going from cvs to svn is learning to type svn instead of > cvs :-) I am fine with switching to SVN, and I agree with you that using this as a backend for any of the major DVCS is a good compromise. It would be a good idea to have SVN running on the Hurd before switching. Also, I checked out savannah and could not find the option you mention above. Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
