At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:09:45 +0800, Wei Shen wrote: > I still think there are ways to solve this problem. For example, the fs > server can add an virtual root argument to the passive translator, and the > translator (which we trust) will later add this virtual root to any path > argument provided by the chroot process.
How does it know the process is chroot'ed? _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
