URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?6614>
Summary: `sync' vs. `syncfs'
Project: The GNU Hurd
Submitted by: tschwinge
Submitted on: Saturday 03/10/07 at 19:17
Category: The GNU Hurd
Should Start On: Saturday 03/10/07 at 00:00
Should be Finished on: Saturday 03/10/07 at 00:00
Priority: 1 - Later
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Percent Complete: 0%
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Planned Release: None
Effort: 0.00
Wiki-like text discussion box:
_______________________________________________________
Details:
On a Hurd system we currently have both `sync' (from GNU coreutils) and
`syncfs' (from GNU Hurd), whereas the former provides only a subset of the
fuctionality of the latter.
In my opinion, they should be merged, having `syncfs' be absorbed into
coreutils's `sync'.
This, of course, needs to be discussed with <bug-coreutils@gnu.org>.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?6614>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
